The primary reason for the stagnation of the ๐ฃ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ ๐๐ณ๐ ๐๐ถ๐ท๐น๐ถ ๐ฌ๐ผ๐ท๐ป๐ฎ (๐ฃ๐ ๐ฆ-๐ ๐๐ฌ) scheme is the concentration of installations in few states.
๐ฉ Gujarat, with justย 10.8% of national gross applications, coveredย 28.4% of gross national household coverage.
๐ฉ Maharashtra, with justย 10.2% of national gross applications, coveredย 24.3% of gross national household coverage.
๐ฉ Uttar Pradesh, with justย 18.4% of national gross applications, coveredย 12.6% of gross national household coverage.
๐ฉ Andhra Pradesh with 23% of national gross applications, coveredย just 3.4% of gross national household coverage.
๐ฉ The top 3 states of Gujarat, Maharashtra and Uttar Pradesh covered 40% of total applications, 59% of total installations and 65% of total households.
๐ฉ The top 5 states (the top 3 + Kerala and Rajasthan) cover 48% of total applications, 73% of total installations and 77% of total households.
๐ฉ The top 10 states (the top 5 + Madhya Pradesh, Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Uttarakhand and Tamil Nadu) cover 85% of total applications, 90% of total installations and 91% of total households.
Read more on PMS-MBY:
๐ก๐ฒ๐ฒ๐ฑ ๐ณ๐ผ๐ฟ ๐ฑ๐ถ๐๐ฒ๐ฟ๐๐ถ๐ณ๐ถ๐ฐ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ผ๐ณ ๐๐ผ๐น๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ด๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ฟ๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐ฎ๐ฐ๐ฟ๐ผ๐๐ ๐๐๐ฎ๐๐ฒ๐ ๐ฎ๐ป๐ฑ ๐ถ๐๐ ๐ฏ๐ฒ๐ป๐ฒ๐ณ๐ถ๐๐ โ https://lnkd.in/gmDwS5Px
๐๐ต๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฒ๐ป๐ด๐ฒ๐ ๐๐ผ ๐ฃ๐ ๐ฆ๐๐ฟ๐๐ฎ๐ด๐ต๐ฎ๐ฟ ๐ฅ๐ง๐ฆ ๐ถ๐ป๐๐๐ฎ๐น๐น๐ฎ๐๐ถ๐ผ๐ป ๐๐ป๐ฑ๐ฒ๐ฟ ๐๐๐ฏ๐๐ถ๐ฑ๐ ๐๐ฐ๐ต๐ฒ๐บ๐ฒ โhttps://lnkd.in/gYwGjS7C